[Archive]

Posted By: Jeff Lichtman

Mike, I suspect it was because OJ was deemed to be the ringleader that he was not offered a cooperation deal to testify against his purported underlings. If that was the case, I don't have a problem with it; however, if he wasn't offered a non-cooperation plea deal that is just unfair. And you're right about his conduct; after getting away with murder you'd think he would have been the most careful, law-abiding guy in the world. Unfortunately, the same bad part of him that led him to kill his wife surfaced again in Vegas. Pitiful.

One thing I find interesting is that oftentimes the very same liberal voices that cry out everytime George Bush pulls an extrajudicial move have no problem voicing their delight over the fact that OJ may have been convicted due to inadmissible, prejudicial matters, i.e., the murder tiral.