Posted By:
leonI didn't mean to associate you with the other crap. My email back to you was private but I did say you are associating with someone I am not fond of. And I might have also said that I feel we are who we associate with... I have always held that as a rule....
I have taken my comment regarding your thoughts on the card out of that post. My apology for putting your name in there....It should have been a different post. I still disagree with your analysis as I am not convinced there should be ink in the areas of paper loss, as if this was an "underprint". An overprint would have exactly the ink it left on the paper loss areas. Another thing is that Richard L has stated, I believe, he has a lot of this kind of brand's insignias but has never seen a print like is on the card in question. I think it was done after the card was made...regards