View Single Post
  #1  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:14 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default T206 JACK DUNN....Babe Ruth's 1st manager

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis

1st......so, you still say......
"i still think you're wrong about the card and that is my opinion, something i am entitled to have."

You are entitled to your opinion on this matter.....but, you are 100% wrong.


Let's review this scenario....Joe D posts a scan of his T206 Powell (horizontal) with a Sweet Cap 350 back.

You followed up with your...."already proved wrong ted's theory on the series numbers."

This told me that you did not understand the complexities of the T206 front/back permutations.
So, I proceeded to explain in detail the back arrangement of the 6 horizontal T206 cards for you, and Joe D,
and anyone else that was interested.

I will repeat this information here for your benefit, since I don't think you bothered to read it the first time.


These six HORIZONTAL cards were printed in the 1st Series of T206 set and issued in 1909/1910




Two are classified as "150-only" Subjects....that means they are ONLY found with Piedmont 150, Sweet Cap 150,
Sovereign 150 and Brown HINDU. They are......

PATTEE
PELTY

Three HORIZONTAL cards are classified as 150/350 Subjects....that is they are found with Piedmont 150 or 350,
Sweet Cap 150 or 350, Sovereign 150 or 350 and Brown HINDU. They are......
\--------------------/

BIRMINGHAM
MURPHY
POWELL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Joe D's card....that you questioned my knowledge of

MULLIN....is found with Piedmont 150, Sweet Cap 150, Sovereign 150 and Brown HINDU....and ONLY with a rare
Piedmont 350.


OK, do you understand this now ?

If so, perhaps you can understand why I'm ticked-off at you....be a man and admit you jumped to a rash con-
clusion that was unwarranted ?


2nd......I deleted the comments in my initial post here regarding the "horizontal" aspect of the Jack Dunn card because
it was causing a distraction to my original intent of this thread regarding Jack Dunn.
If someone wants to "hijack" a thread, they would be better served to initiate a new thread on their off-topic post.


TED Z

Reply With Quote