Posted By:
Ted ZanidakisI admitted my mistake regarding the Plank SC 150/30 card. Even Bill Heitman's book and Scot Reader's 1st book edition had not
accounted for the existence of this back on Plank.
Now are we going to see an apology from Ali L....regarding his remark to me......
"already proved wrong ted's theory on the series numbers." ? ?
A stupid remark like this shows how uninformed this guy is about the T206 set.
Look, JOHN W, I started what I thought was an interesting thread about an unheralded T206 guy and the role he played in
launching Babe Ruth's career.
And, then it was "hijacked"....simply because in my opinion, the Dunn card in no way represents a horizontal T206 card.
If this card had an artistic backdrop, the argument would be over.
Now, I am surprised at your comment....
"It would be safe to say IMO that Pattee & Pelty along with others were most likley printed in the 350 as well, we just haven't
found them yet I see no need to select just 4 of the 6 above to carry into the 350 by themselves...that's just my thoughts."
There are 11 cards in the 1st Series that are classified as "150-only" Subjects......this is an established fact.
Ames (hands/chest)
M Brown (Cubs)
G Brown (Chi)
Burch (batting)
Donlin (fielding)
L Doyle (throwing)
Evers (bat-blue sky)
Pattee (Horiz.)
Pelty (Horiz.)
Powers
Reulbach (glove)
These will never be found with any 350 backs. One can live to 100 and have looked at 100,000 T206's and I'll bet you....you
will never find any of these 11 with any other back then a 150-type.
TED Z