View Single Post
  #94  
Old 07-04-2008, 06:40 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Let's continue the T213-1 debate....are they really T206's ?

Posted By: MVSNYC

"The thinner paper was to conform with product packaging (I believe someone pointed out evidence to support this)."

Joe D- do you think that minute fraction of an inch (probably the thickness of a strand of hair), was to conform to product packaging?


Ted- interesting thread, who really knows...


Brian- when discussing golf scores here, please tell us what you shoot on a regulation course, not "chip & put"...thanks!


Happy 4th everyone!!!

i'm going to a rooftop party later (high-rise building on 34th & the east river, 30th floor), RIGHT infront of the Macy*s Fireworks Display!

Reply With Quote