[Archive]

Posted By: paul

July 3 2008, 2:50 AM was the time of Nancy's first post. Before that I see only two references to the daughter. One was "Poor Kid." -- the second was "looks like they had a daughter, what an idiot." -- the third was "I wonder if they are going to update their photos to include Paige meeting them in prison." Now I really doubt that the these posters meant anything negative about the daughter, but were rather talking about the mother and father.

So Nancy easily saw the upsurge on her pix page, and googled her own name. Well guess what is in the number 5 spot, actually ahead of the original article, yep, this thread.

So she comes on here and throws out some gems. "I GUESS CARD COLLECTORS ARE LOWER THAN INITALLY THOUGHT." is by far my favorite. I'm not exactly sure what or who 'INITALLY' is, let alone why 'INITALLY' would be thinking about card collectors in the first place.


Anyone who has ever read anything about scammers, which we as a community have had to deal with too many times before; know how the BS works. One defense is to, shift the focus away from the topic (saying bs was said about the daughter, when it wasn't), a second is to blame the victim. So back to the "I GUESS CARD COLLECTORS ARE LOWER THAN INITALLY THOUGHT." statement, well we all know that she just can't spell. She was saying that we, as a community deserve to be ripped off. Just because we were talking about the case and making fun of the two accused.



Paul

just edited.... If I would've kept reading her posts I would've caught the "YES SLAP ON THE WRIST SUPERVISION! LOL." but with all those caps, oi...