Posted By:
Kenny Cole"Bulldog," you are completely wrong. A seller's misconception about the worth of the item being sold is pretty much irrelevant to the issue of whether there's a "meeting of the minds" when the seller offers an item for sale. There are very rare exceptions, but this would not be one of them. I suspect that you are not a lawyer, from the University of Phoenix or otherwise, because you have no idea what you are talking about.
Your "ambulance chaser" comment just shows that you are an clueless idiot. In that regard, I suspect Josh's income is FAR superior to yours, as is his education, his knowledge, his ability, and pretty much every other trait. If you were able to read and comprehend, which I sort of doubt based on your posts, I think you would find that he never said he would take the case. Nor would he need to in order to make a living. The issue he was adressing was simply whether there was a contract -- and, based on what Jamie said about the circumstances of the deal, there was. The fact that you cannot understand the simple concept of offer, acceptance and consideration shows that you have zero legal training since contracts is a first year, first semester law school class.
It's great to have an opinion, but its even better if you have a basis for it. You don't. Have a nice day.
Kenny Cole
edited to add: please do not put anything in the NAME box other than your name. Adding text in that box shortens up the message text box.