Posted By:
Mattjoann - there is no "his PO receipt means nothing because a scammer would have a receipt without having mailed the item" part of the thread.
There is a "a PO receipt doesn't mean it got sent" part of this thread.
There is a chasm between accusing someone of doing wrong and suggesting that their defense is not factually correct. The difference is one you have failed to make in multiple threads.
To help illustrate, consider this (purposely silly) example: if someone accused of murder (A) comes on and says they couldn't have murdered because they are blind, a poster (B) saying that blind people can murder isn't accusing A of murder; B is just saying that such an argument is not factually accurate. All that was said here is that a receipt of paying for postage is not proof of mailing.