Posted By:
davidcyclebackA question is if Clemens actually did take only B12 and Lidocane and feels the trainer is mistaken, why didn't he simply tell this to Mitchell when Mitchell invited him and his lawyer to give their input? Is it just me, or would this have been the most obvious and sanest avenue to impart the knowledge if accurate, in particular considering Mitchell has said he removed a player's name from the document after the player provided counter evidence. Refusing to offer this information months earlier to a respected former judge in private quarters, but coming out with a YouTube video and staging a 60 Minutes interview in your kitchen is, to say the least, an odd and circuitous way to impart information if the information is true, simple and shows your innocence. And, considering the principle of Occam's Razor, there are always reasons someone, and lawyer, forgoes the simplest, most obvious and seemingly most self-beneficial way of doing things.