View Single Post
  #55  
Old 10-02-2006, 06:35 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Can we say something positive about PSA or is it always terrible?

Posted By: Jeff Lichtman

"SGC does distinguish b/t white and yellow letters in the 58 topps set. If you go to clemente, for example, on the second page of the report, his name is in blue (ie signifying there is a link). If you click it, you get the following:

0 0 8 14 30 24 22 20 19 4 6 4 0 0 0 1 152
White Letters 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 8 14 30 24 22 21 19 4 6 4 0 0 0 1 153"

That's just for Clemente. What about the dozens of other variations of which SGC doesn't account for? And the Herrera error card? At first I thought that SGC never graded any of these versions as their pop numbers are so low on this set-but I've seen a few of the error cards in SGC holders. This stuff drives me nuts. While PSA's numbers are all screwed up on the pop reports due to slabs being cracked, errors, etc., at least they have their heads in the game. SGC's registry and pop reports have the looks of third grade art projects. I love their slabs - but am so disappointed by their backup resources.

Reply With Quote