Posted By:
JimBI did not mean to imply anything about the seller when I said that the card had to have been switched. I just seemed so off that I would not think PSA would have given that card a 6. I, personally, did NOT presume that the seller switched it. For all I know, he may have been duped or thought it was accurately graded (or close enough). Now he has been honest and up front about what happened. Apparently PSA did give it a 6. I was wrong about their grading. I never intended to accuse the seller of anything. He seems like a honest guy.
JimB
Edited to add the "NOT" which was omitted by mistake. 
Thanks Leon for reading my mind and catching my mistake.