[Archive]

Posted By: Eric Brehm

My #71 Burke and #88 Rollings both measure 2.3625 inches in width, i.e. 1/80th (0.0125) inch shorter than the nominal 2 3/8 (2.375) inches. So in my sample (based on rounding off to the nearest 1/80th inch), where I found that cards are 0.01 inch shorter than expected on average, that deviation for those two particular cards is in fact about average. But I don't have other Burke and Rollings cards to compare them to.