[Archive]

Posted By: Joann

Both this list and the one in the other thread appear to have come from CNBC, who has since taken down the article.

If this it the list, I guess my initial reaction is ... that's all? Really? Ho-hum. I'm a bit shocked. I guess I thought there would be some surprises, but not really. Heck, there aren't even enough people on the list for there to be a lot by way of surprise.

I only see 3 or 4 that have ever played for the Tigers as far as I know. If that's it, then I'm back to ho-hum.

Maybe the real bullets will be in the parts of the report that don't name names, something like a statement that 90% of pitchers and 70% of field players between the years of X and Y took steroids.

Because if the whole bang is limited to this list, then it's not that big a deal as far as I can tell.

J