[Archive]

Posted By: JimB

That is a gorgeous card! I agree with Barry; it would probably be a 7 if not for the back problems. I think knocking it to a 4 would be about right, but I am not sure PSA is being inconsistent with their standards here. I have seen a number of PSA 5s with paper loss. If SGC were to give this card a 2/30 for this card, I think that would be too harsh of a downgrade. I think people are conditioned to think PSA made an error here because SGC would be so harsh on an error like this. Generally the grading companies are in agreement on technical issues, but not always. Let's be serious here; that is an amazing card.
JimB