[Archive]

Posted By: Steve

Ok..I'll clarify my statement that was nitpicked on.


In my opinion it is possible that the Ruth card in question could have been overgraded. I mean how else could they satisfy everyone involved? Also they do use .5 system and IMO that could be the basis of the overgrading. I mean it wouldn't be the first time I saw a GAI card with the .5 bump.

I mean lets be serious here grading is not an exact science. I could see the card and then claim it as fact )IMO)


Steve