[Archive]

Posted By: Joe Pelaez

Pennsylvania Ted:

"JOE

"Say something.....POSITIVE.....without qualifying it ! !

Surprise us.


And Joe.....
You stated...."I've been researching the Doyle for twenty years."

Then, how come you didn't notice this "printer's mark".....before I did ?"

TED Z

*
*

1. I'll gladly qualify whatever you want me to qualify.

2. To question number two.

About your earth shaking discovery of the printers mark.
It might be difficult for your Bowmen mindset to recall, but it took from 1909 till 1980 for someone like Fritsch to come across
the Slow Joe Doyle error.
Therefore, I will apologize for not spotting the dot on a card during my 20 years of research on the Doyle error.
BTW, how many dots have you come up with?
For someone that just discovered the Doyle error, you do pretty good work.
Unfortunately, you undermine, and defeat all that work, by inserting some misinformation with it.

Misinformation, is the worse possible ingredient to a researcher.
It can sidetrack, their research.
Now, are you going to work with me on the 6-7-8 or 9 names of the GOOD known Doyles that according to YOU have been found?


Or, like the dealers of the 1990 Texas national, do nothing, and let the collectors fend for themselves.

Your move Ted.

Joe Pelaez