Thread: 756*
View Single Post
  #152  
Old 08-12-2007, 11:53 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default 756*

Posted By: Gilbert Maines

Only a lawyer would claim the absence of evidence = proof !

"Bonds is wildly guilty of, at the very least, using steroids. Why would a guy who knows nothing about Bonds' use of steroids refuse to answer grand jury questions and instead go to prison? If Bonds was clean as so many of his apologists would have you believe, than why won't Anderson answer the simple questions before him?"

Reply With Quote