[Archive]

Posted By: Cobby33

Jeff-

I realize that many people are convicted and jailed in circumstantial evidence cases and typically, the Criminal Defense Bar puts their own "*" after those convictions (e.g. Scott Peterson). I would think that as an accomplished criminal defense attorney, you would be skeptical (and would probably love defending) a case premised on circumstantial evidence only.

Here, we don't even have a case with circumstantial evidence brought forward, which suggests to me that any evidence against Bonds (non-perjury, which is linked to the threshold issue) is not even strong enough to prosecute (in any arena).