View Single Post
  #117  
Old 04-16-2007, 11:30 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.

Posted By: Frank Wakefield

Well I think that definition is crap...


The T206 Wagner doesn't have a copyright date on it, so that's why it is copied and reproduced... That would not dare happen with a 1933 Goudey card of Dizzy Dean, no reprints of it 'cause it has a date and copyright. Right...

Goudey Gum cards weren't approved by MLB, 'cause MLB didn't exist back then...

Nationally distributed, nonsense. Fred McMullin's rookie card in my mind is his ZeeNut card. No national distribution there.

And lord only knows who the true manufacturer of the ZeeNut card was... I understand ZeeNuts distributed them, but who printed them??

Frank.

Reply With Quote