Posted By:
Fred CI'm all for the American way of not convicting someone before they've had a fair trial. In this case the NFL seems to be taking the opposite stance. If the NFL sees him guilty then there must be something to it. They're all about image and convicting someone before there time doesn't make sense unless they know something that the general public doesn't. I guess any video tapes of him attending the dog fights would be explained away somehow.... remember, "you can't convict if the glove doesn't fit" or was it "if the glove doesn't fit you can't convict"... same difference... I guess.