Posted By:
Steve Murray
1. Card was rejected for alterations by a grading service but, with nothing being done to it, subsequently was graded by the same service.
This one I have a problem with. If there is an alteration the fact that it had been rejected should be disclosed irrespective of whether it passed the second time through. On the other hand if it could be conclusively shown that there was NO alteration I have no disclosure issue here.
_____________________________________
2. Card was rejected for alterations by a grading service but, with nothing being done to it, subsequently was graded by a different service.
Same response as to number 1.
______________________________________
3. Card was cracked out or resubmitted, with nothing being done to it, and received a higher grade from either the same or a different service.
No problem with this one.
______________________________________
4. Card was cracked out, improved, resubmitted, and received a higher grade.
No problem with this one.
EDIT EDIT Misread. I have a big problem with this one. This is a No No period.