Posted By:
Steve M.(I'm an old man and can't stay up as late as you young whippersnappers or else I would have responded earlier) 
1. I too think it out of character for T.G. to be "Sam". I can only go on my prior dealings with him and the several emails exchanged over the past few days where he disclaims being "Sam". I have no other information.
2. I have likewise exchanged emails with Bobby. While it is clear that he is implying that T.G. is "Sam" he has not provided (at least not to me)any solid evidence to support his suspicions.
3. Yes Jerry's was a stupid post. What was the purpose?
Finally, anyone can "imply" all they want. Until there is a direct accusation supported by solid proof there is really no need for this to continue.
Disclaimer: I am a subscriber to VCP and have found it to be an invaluable resource.