Posted By:
SamScott -
Let's not be mistaken, I am addressing Mr. Binder aggressively. He has shown a complete disregard for common sense. I'm not sure why it matters how many times I've talked on the board. I choose to read and watch. I have some issues with Mr. Binder in the same way others have issues with various auction houses. I have never shopped at an auction house so I don't have much to add. The rules state that your name and email go by controversial threads, and I have followed that rule. Beyond that, the issue here is not me, it is Bobby. Everybody else seems to let things slide, and that is why I want an answer.
Bobby -
First, your next response should simply be to answer my question. On top of that, I do not know why you choose to keep building lies on top of lies. After this remark, I actually went back and found the thread (here's the link for easy reading: http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/thread/1172496276/). You did not issue a refund that particular day. It took a phone call from the pissed off customer. And at that point, you couldn't reverse his credit card charges? Seems odd, but i guess if he gets his money, then he gets his money.
You attempted to hold money that was not yours. It does not appear like you had any intention of refunding that money until you were publicly outed. Then you even went and said something stupid like you had to talk to a lawyer before you could issue you a refund. Somehow issuing a refund meant the user never was a member of your site. I don't get that one bit.
Please just answer my questions and don't skirt the issue. This is not about who I am, it's not about who you are, it is not about who likes you or anything else except the following:
You posted a log of a user account.
The user logged in with an AOL IP
Your screenshot showed that user logging in with the same IP over several months, even though AOL hands out different IPS.
Did you post any fraudulent information? If not, how do you account for the discrepancy
Please note, I thought it was a screenshot, but apparently it was just a log. Still doesn't change my point though.