[Archive]

Posted By: Frank Evanov

Am I understanding this right? April 16 2007, 5:22 PM


Is it the consensus belief that the auctions were allegedly shilled up to a certain level and these "repeats" were the cards that were not topped by a real bidder? And PSA was allegedly complicit by allowing the cards to be reholdered with a new lower cert #?


That sounds right except for the PSA part. There is a lot of time between ML auctions. They could cetainly "bury" the Goudeys in a bunch of commons and submit to PSA individually. That way they get new certs without PSA's help.

Then again, PSA's actions on CU and their lack of response to this issue merely serve to heighten one's suspicion of their role here.

Frank