[Archive]

Posted By: ErlandStevens

If you didn't know the truth about the card (two pieces), I think most people would be hard pressed to conclude that the card was assembled from two parts. Once you know the truth, the wording of the description does accurately describe the card. By refering to the "bottom portion" and the "rest of the card", the writer infers (my opinion) that there are two pieces. It seems to me that the writer certainly knew the true nature of the card.

I have no experience with auction houses, so I'll ask the board - Would an auction house be able to fight a return based on this description?