Posted By:
Ted ZanidakisOK, wiseguy....tell us why anyone would alter a 1933G Joe Judge or a wrinkled up old N162 Dunlap ?
Neither of these cards command big $$'s; therefore, only a fool would waste his time altering them.
And, a bigger fool to make a determination on a card that he has not even closely examined.
And, I will repeat this for the last time.....the scan must be deceiving you.....or you are deceiving
yourself. There is not a hint of ink in those wrinkles, what you are seeing is "shadow effect" in a
wrinkle (or two) in an imperfect scan
I've noticed your previous posts in other Threads, you seem to derive a certain "diabolical thrill" out
of instigating controversy.
Well, you claim to be an expert, then why is it you don't understand, that in a 4 (or 6) color printing
process (100 years ago and still today) that the YELLOW ink is the first color to be applied ?
Both these cards, simply, never received the subsequent inking phases. I have numerous such color
errors from different BB card sets, that are colored YELLOW....when they should have been Orange,
Green, etc.
This ends my discussion with you......as my wise uncle once told me......"don't argue with a fool, for
on-lookers will not be able to distinguish who the fool is".
And, I don't want any Net54 members reading this Thread to have any doubts who the fool is.
And, it's not me....go back and read this Thread....I didn't start this "bull-crap".
T-Rex TED