View Single Post
  #24  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:31 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy

Posted By: Andy

I agree with Steve M. The reason this post is innappropiate is because this post isn't an update of what HAS happened. It is a message (threat?) from one party to the other, which is of no business to anyone except them. Mark hasn't addressed any of the readers of this board to respond as was done earlier when he wanted opinions on the subject. He is sending a message to Steve that only Steve needs to be reading.

This isn't the proper venue for this message and I think everyone knows that.

My two cents.

Thanks,

Andy

Reply With Quote