Posted By:
Joe PelaezI Luv this thread.
It reminds me of the good Ol' daze.
The only difference is:
We're debating ova who's a betta, and knowledgeable slabba?
In the old daze it was:
How can you call that a NR-NR- NR BU? 
Now for a few thoughts from our forum.
*******************
*
*
"With all due respect...why is it about bashing PSA again? What makes everyone on here so certain (every time) that PSA got it wrong, but SGC got it right? SGC deemed the card trimmed....for all anyone knows...maybe THEY got it wrong..."
---------------------------------------------------------
"It is quite possible that PSA got it right, and maybe SGC was being cautious.
This is a great example of why it is important that there is more than one respected authority selling their 'opinion' in the form of a slab."
---------------------------------------------------------
"Yes, you are correct... March 1 2007, 10:48 AM
You could have 100 experts grade a card and get 100 opinions. PSA graded my card and gave it a 4. I am sure that they measured it and if they had a problem with the size then looking at the edges is the next step. When they looked at the edges they must have felt confident to say it was NOT trimmed."
----------------------------
Re: I am not a PSA basher...but? March 1 2007, 10:52 AM
"I agree with you guys...ask 100 opinions...you'll get 100 diff ones...but...when so much $$$$ is at stake with some cards...there needs to be more continuity w/grading. I'm done beating a dead horse."
---------------------------
*
*
*
It sounds like the start of a clamoring for a new, or betta third party arbitrator ... by the investors - to the investors and for the investors.
An un bias pillar of integrity, deeply rooted in the concrete sturdiness of truth and the pursuit of the un profit world of monetary cleanliness.
Something, or some one like the ..... UN ... maybe?
Nope, the hobby hasn't changed much, only the names and mindset.
There are eight million stories in our Naked City, and this has been one of them.