View Single Post
  #58  
Old 02-24-2007, 09:28 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Mastronet, I may be wrong here but let's here opinions??

Posted By: Jason L

and it is terribly relevant as I was perusing the Huggins & Scott catalog that I just got last night....alot of fun if you have time, but also alot of effort required to read the long paragraphs and find the single-card detailed info that I am looking for...

I really like Leon's idea of segregating the data from the commentary.

For example, a catalog/lot listing should look more like this:

Lot#: 2411
Title/Name: (24) 1950-1957 Baseball Cards - HOFers
List of Included Items:
1
2
3
(each line lists the Year, Mfr, Player, Grade for each card, or something similar if these were sets or subsets...something like this that makes it easier to read)

Description:
This is the finest grouping of 1950's baseball cards we've ever seen! You would be stupid not bid on this, because you'd be passing up a chance to own
the best players of the decade, etc. etc....

Reply With Quote