View Single Post
  #33  
Old 02-23-2007, 10:03 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Mastronet, I may be wrong here but let's here opinions??

Posted By: Steve M.

but this thread is an unwarranted slam at the auction house and the description of this lot. The lot consists of 153 cards of varying condition. Is it really expected that the description of a GD card needs much more than that. Does every little teensy weeny mark, wrinkle, crease, stain, remnant, paper loss, etc, ad nauseum have to be detailed for what is described as a card in GD condition? I trust that when Pete grades out a raw card as GD he has taken all faults into consideration in making that assessment. I personally don't need more than that.

Reply With Quote