Posted By:
Jeff LichtmanDan edited the above emails between he and Pete to remove the offending portions.
Look, we all understand that cards described as VG or F get to that grade for a reason. But it wouldn't have hurt Mastro (except perhaps financially) to describe cards with paper loss as such. What attribute of a card is more important to a collector? Mastro's writers seem to know every single adjective in the English language. Perhaps "paper loss" can be part of their vocabluary going forward.