[Archive]

Posted By: RayB

is a nice tool for entering cards to the set and a well appreciated resource.

Humor me if this has been discussed before please.
I noticed that the Back Multipliers are not quite as currently accurate as some of the discussions here regarding Back rarity.
Anybody well heeled in the set and with Backs research experience care to take a stab at realigning these multipliers?
For instance Polar Bear and EPDG are both 1.3 multipliers. I would think based on some typical discussions here that PB would be more like 1.1 and EPDG would be more like 1.5 or 1.75.
Any basic thoughts?
Anybody willing to take a stab at the whole list of 40 Backs?
Maybe we can all come up with agreeable designations.

I'll give it some thought and post here too.
RayB