View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-21-2007, 06:38 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Back damage on 1915 Cracker Jacks

Posted By: James Gallo

I find that there are not as many Cracker Jacks with back damage as other T and Caramel cards.

I think rat/bug damage is more of a problem, so you see a lot of cards missing corners or with spots of paper loss but not the same type of damage from say being in an album.

That being said my johnson has a NM front and heavy back damage.

I have a bunch of extra Cracker Jacks so LMK when you take your next step.

Good luck it's a fun set and feel free to drop me a line with any questions.

Best

James Gallo

Looking for 1915 Cracker Jacks and 1909-11 American Caramel E90-1.

Reply With Quote