Thread: SGC's Response
View Single Post
  #15  
Old 11-30-2006, 10:57 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default SGC's Response

Posted By: warshawlaw

Dave, that was a straightforward, intelligible statement of policy that is consistent with the views of the vintage collectors I know.

T206, dude, you have it wrong. All Dave said is that if they cannot detect an alteration, they cannot stop it. He did not say it was OK, just that his company has an (obvious) practical limit on what they can do.

Reply With Quote