Posted By:
Scot Reader
Barry, Thanks for starting this thread. Some important points have been made by Lee, Brian and others as to the value and limitations of Bill's superset data. I personally think its greatest value will ultimately prove to be isolating hundreds (if not thousands) of theoretically possible front/back combinations that do not exist in fact. This will result in an improved T206 checklist that is less over-inclusive than the current one. Better still, patterns may emerge among the theoretically-but-not-really possible front/back combinations that will enable us to better understand the set. Scot