[Archive]

Posted By: Lee Behrens

Barry,

I do believe that there needs to be some adjustments but Bill's data does not tell how many of each back have actually been recorded. There is a possiblity that each back did not depict all the cards in each series. That is what makes this set such a mystery.

Is there anybody out there (Scot?) that has data such as Jim B has pointed with total cards and % of backs? I know Bill is attempting this but I noticed that even my data is not even close to right since i know that I have more than 460 cardsbut that is the data he has so far from me and I have figured out exactly what I do have and send it too him.

Lee