Posted By:
leonI don't really think it's that slippery unless there are some commercial laws I don't know (which would include 98% of them)...Since we are here I cut and pasted Mark's response so I could answer it....This is kind of fun....
How about factual mistakes and outright lying?
*if you knew for a fact someone was committing fraud lying( sic) then that, imo, wouldn't be against the interference rule...similar to the altered card ruling
Anyone mind if I say I have $500 into this card when I bought it for $300 last week. It's the buyer's job to figure determine value and third parties should not interfere, right?
*see above response
Everyone cool if I say the card I'm selling is the highest graded when PSA has actually graded two higher?
*see above response
Any objection to my selling a CDV of a common player and professing it's Dummy Hoy? Heck, this can happen (and has) as an honest mitake. Caveat emptor?
*buying on someone's "professing" is caveat emptor...and as stated if someone knows for a fact it's not Hoy then they should come forward...but only if sure..
next volley.....
edited grammar and some spelling but still poor...