View Single Post
  #8  
Old 10-22-2006, 11:04 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default was it common back then ?

Posted By: jP

Barry or Joe (thanks for the scan) Is it more likely that a card that has had laquer or gloss applied to it would have a better chance of being authentic rather than a reprint? i have seen reprints of T206 & T205 and they are glossy like the cards of today (upper deck,topps etc.)an obvious gloss that you can tell was applied in the production process.

on the other hand i have seen cards that something was applied to it and its easy to see it was done by human hand. That leaves the ? of possible authenticity.

i would think those that are in the business of making fake T206's dont apply gloss to them.

what do you think ?

Reply With Quote