Posted By:
Gilbert MainesYou must say no right away, and stick to it!
The problem, as I see it is in defining the difference between photographs and baseball cards. Clearly, some are easier than others. Unfortunately for me, the modern stuff seems more like basaeball cards than the early stuff.
And OJs are perhaps my primary love in this hobby.
Through the cabinets, CDVs, etc. which we all love: these things are photographs. Perhaps attractively displayed, but photos only. The Mayos - which I particularly like (and really can't afford in almost any condition) are photos.
This is terrible.
Say it isn't so.
Heck, the Kimballs are good, and the 162s - gotta love Anson's color!
But its the OJs which are the foundation. This can't be. I guess I am mistaken. What is the difference between a photo and a card?