[Archive]

Posted By: Elliot

Pretty clear from the ACC page that it can't be a F211. Now a F-unc is a whole different story. I think a reasonable argument can be made that Burdick did not list the card seperately under the E category, and only referenced to the E92's (under the F's) to show that the front was similiar to an E-92. Since he never assigned a particular number to the cards they would be F-unc.