[Archive]

Posted By: barry arnold

Ted Z.

many thanks for all the attention to the details of the various arguments presented.
your 'sectionalizing' argument re: the 150 to 350 color change is most illuminative.although i don't have the pied 150 waddell, i note that my Waddell portrait sc 150 fact 30 exhibits one of the
deepest blues of any of my cards, no matter what the series. I note that you mention that you have one of four pied 150's that exhibits similarly. My
Waddell even presents with a deeper blue than my Chase pied 350 portrait.
What does the exceptionality of the blue coloring of the Waddell in your
Pied 150 portrait say about the argument that there is a deepening of the
blue color from series to series? Also does this impact your argument regarding color enhancement in the 350 series which gives rise to the clarity of the dove---so that we're saying as Scot does in a recent post that we're perhaps dealing with a matter of degree rather than of kind.
Is the Waddell significant?

thanks for the help.
and the fabulous ride.

best,
barry