View Single Post
  #27  
Old 07-23-2006, 05:04 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Grading the Graders.......Who is the WORST ? GAI

Posted By: Rob

I 've have an "7-8" and a "6" cards get mishandled by PSA, getting small mid creases on the back, gained only through hard squeezing a card saver, and coming back as "4"'s (something I had determined with experiments). I had thought it was my imagination, or perhaps I did something wrong. I was wondering if anyone else has had such an experience? The "6" lost more value than the "7-8" card,and it seems 2 yet more valuable slider cards each went for a grade higher than I expected, perhaps to compensate for that bungling, so it's not a net loss I am concerned about, but whether such mishandling happens very often.

In any event, I make darn sure I keep enlarged scans of any card I submit to any grading company. I was wondering if anyone has attempted to get compensated by PSA/SGC/GAI ect for such damage? It seems like it would be impossible to prove in any subsequent litigation, as such abscence of hairline creases aren't really going to show up in a scan.

Reply With Quote