[Archive]

Posted By: Sal

Could some of you let me know if it's not out of the ordinary for the E145 1914 CrackerJack series cards to be 1/16th of an inch shorter either top to bottom or side to side other than the 2-1/4"x3" size some literature states they are.
I have some that look good (unaltered), even under magnification but are 1/16th short or just slightly less than that from either top to bottom or side to side.
None exceed the 1/16th in shortness.
Seems to me from what I can tell, the sizes can vary just a smidge.
Any help would be deeply appreciated.

Sal