[Archive]

Posted By: davidcycleback

Beyond that he obviously hasn't had it carbon dated, that he says that it is carbon datd has been makes it fraud. He says at the end, "This is a binding contract" but has put information in the contract that he knows is false. The fact that he puts this claim in print on a pubic forum for thousands of people to read shows what an idiot he is. When another seller says "I am not an expert so am offering this as an unauthenticated reprint," at least he can argue with a smidgen of credibility that he was ignorant at the time of sale and didn't know what he was doing. When you claim something was carbon dated at Gonzaga University at the official papers say the card is 100% 1910, it's hard to later claim "Oh yeah, I forgot. I meant to get it carbon dated, but had to cancel at the last minute so I could pick up my daughter at school. My mistake."