[Archive]

Posted By: Joann

Whoa. Peter - I think that people were tossing about possibilities and opinions. It started with the importance (if any) that the fact that this was an offline deal contrary to ebay's rule would have on the buyer's options.

It looked to me like general trading opinions and counterpoints and not necessarily a legal debate strictly related to this exact situation. Even so, several of the issues raised could be important to those on this board that routinely transact via mail or some other <100% reliable delivery method. Who knows? Maybe next time it will be a truly rare and expensive card, and someone might remember reading something here and at least think to ask about recourse.

My main concern is to clarify that, much as I've enjoyed the back and forth of this thread, I certainly had no intent that it get hijacked at all and especially not for any personal benefit to me. Lordy I apologize to anyone that thinks that.

I just want to see how Kyle makes out on this!

Joann