[Archive]

Posted By: BlackSoxFan

I think people are mixing up issues here. No one is 100% positive that this is infact the same card. It is possible and it would not be surprising. That being said, proof is not derived from an opinion.
Speaking of 'opinion', what does veracity have to do with anything? The seller is stating an opinion, not a fact. Veracity has nothing to do with it. Although I'm not a lawyer, I would consider this a case of due diligence/negligence. For that matter, it is only a case of due diligence if it is in fact the same card. I believe him withholding facts that are material to the sale would be considered unethical.
I don't have a problem with the author having an opinion that the card is high grade. I do have a problem with him withholding pertinant information, even if he does believe the card was grossly under graded.

Regards,

Black Sox Fan

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

email me