Thread: Rooky13
View Single Post
  #16  
Old 09-20-2005, 08:47 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Rooky13

Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)

Civil conversion? Wow -

What about "unlawful retention". It kind of makes you sick to think that someone would consider using some type of "squatters rights" defense on this. If there's a contract then the person with the cards should just pay the man from whom he got them. How do you try and defense keeping those cards without compensation (unless Ryan donated/gifted the cards to him which doesn't appear to be the case).

I guess it's hard to comment on this without seeing the contract but in any case you would think that a baisc contract would have stated that party A owed party B 'X' amount of dollars to complete the transaction.

Pretty sad.

Reply With Quote