Posted By:
Greg EcklundBob, the difference is that is was proven that Bill lied under oath, but it doesn't seem possible to prove that Palmeiro did even though everyone knows he is a liar. Nothing against Clinton though, this is one Republican who thinks thought that the whole impeachment crap was a big waste of time. If we impeached every US President who was unfaithful to his wife and lied about it, we would probably be up to 35 trials by now.
Jeff...my mistake...I was typing without reading what I was saying and used "charged" when I meant to say "convicted". I'm sure this test could be used as part of a case, but doesn't it take something more substantive to prove he perjured himself?