[Archive]

Posted By: davidcycleback

Personally, I don't like the idea of such a bad seller list.

However, as far as libel goes, it's not libel if:

a) The information is true (If the info is literally correct but terribly misleading, then the specific case can be up for debate).

b) You explicitly say that you are giving your opinion ("In my opinion, Joe Schmoe is a misleading seller and collectors should stay away.")

Just slightly off topic, but reflective of my opinion on these matters. As far as posting publicly that something is a fake, I think one should be certain that the accusation is correct before you make it, admit it when you realize your accusation was incorrect, and forgive those sellers who reform their ways.
<br />