Thread: PSA v. SGC
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 03-24-2005, 08:40 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA v. SGC

Posted By: jay behrens

Closest experience I've had to something like that is when I had a Papoose Gum card of Sitting Bull come back a 60 when I was expecting at least an 88 if not higher. When I asked SGC about it and forwarded a scan, they said it got down graded for the black print marks on front. I had to point out them that they were not print marks, but fibers in the paper. Not likely they are going to make this mistake with a baseball card, but it does happen on occassion

Jay

I've just reached Upper Lower Class. I am now officially a babe magnet for poor chicks.

Reply With Quote